<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="yes"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Hashing on pxta.com</title>
    <link>https://pxta.com/tags/hashing/</link>
    <description>Recent content in Hashing on pxta.com</description>
    <generator>Hugo</generator>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <lastBuildDate>Sun, 25 Oct 2026 00:00:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
    <atom:link href="https://pxta.com/tags/hashing/index.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
    <item>
      <title>A Hashed Email Address Still Identifies Someone, Here Is How Ad Networks Match It</title>
      <link>https://pxta.com/a-hashed-email-address-still-identifies-someone-here-is-how-ad-networks-match-it/</link>
      <pubDate>Sun, 25 Oct 2026 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <guid>https://pxta.com/a-hashed-email-address-still-identifies-someone-here-is-how-ad-networks-match-it/</guid>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;Almost every ad network now offers a way to send customer details from a website &amp;ldquo;securely hashed&amp;rdquo;. Meta calls it advanced matching, Google calls it enhanced conversions, Pinterest calls it enhanced match. The tag runs the visitor&amp;rsquo;s email through SHA-256 and sends a 64-character string instead of the address.&lt;/p&gt;&#xA;&lt;p&gt;That sounds like anonymisation. It isn&amp;rsquo;t, and the networks don&amp;rsquo;t claim it is. The whole point of the feature is to find the person.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>
